<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ban on religious protests should be extended</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.learnedfool.com/ban-on-religious-protests-should-be-extended/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.learnedfool.com/ban-on-religious-protests-should-be-extended</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 01:30:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Fool</title>
		<link>http://www.learnedfool.com/ban-on-religious-protests-should-be-extended#comment-44</link>
		<dc:creator>Fool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 11:04:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.learnedfool.com/?p=271#comment-44</guid>
		<description>Thank you for commenting, Andrew.  As per your suggestion, I did a little research into the BNP and Nick Griffin.  It is not a party I would join, as I have said, but I still understand their stance.  I am more on the moderate side and I would not agree with them inciting hatred.  As I stated, anyone or anything that incites anger or hatred should be banned.  Griffin was convicted of that and it seems that their political stance has softened over the years.  He even retracted the Holohoax.  Whether this was a move to &#039;fool&#039; others I don&#039;t know.  Still, there is no call to riot and protest against a political party from meeting.  We, on the outside, know nothing of what will be said.  If we suspect anything illegal, we should report it and allow the appropriate authorities to deal with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for commenting, Andrew.  As per your suggestion, I did a little research into the BNP and Nick Griffin.  It is not a party I would join, as I have said, but I still understand their stance.  I am more on the moderate side and I would not agree with them inciting hatred.  As I stated, anyone or anything that incites anger or hatred should be banned.  Griffin was convicted of that and it seems that their political stance has softened over the years.  He even retracted the Holohoax.  Whether this was a move to &#8216;fool&#8217; others I don&#8217;t know.  Still, there is no call to riot and protest against a political party from meeting.  We, on the outside, know nothing of what will be said.  If we suspect anything illegal, we should report it and allow the appropriate authorities to deal with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.learnedfool.com/ban-on-religious-protests-should-be-extended#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 02:33:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.learnedfool.com/?p=271#comment-43</guid>
		<description>Erm, interesting, but the BNP bit is WRONG. They are racist, even in their moderate form. They are led by a convicted racist, a man who calls the Holocaust the &quot;Holohoax&quot;. In their 2005 General election manifesto they pledged to scrap all race relations legislation i.e. make racism legal again. It is well documented and common knowledge that they associate with Neo-Nazis and Klu Klux Klan members. It was not so long ago that they were calling for &quot;compulsory repatriation&quot; of anyone not born here. Oh, and here&#039;s the best bit - their constitution actually says that they will not accept members to their party unless they are &quot;Indigenous Caucusians&quot; - i.e. whites only. 

Do your research next time - the problem is that its people like you who are fooled by the BNP and suggest the BNP is not racist or dangerous, that actually give it its credibility.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Erm, interesting, but the BNP bit is WRONG. They are racist, even in their moderate form. They are led by a convicted racist, a man who calls the Holocaust the &#8220;Holohoax&#8221;. In their 2005 General election manifesto they pledged to scrap all race relations legislation i.e. make racism legal again. It is well documented and common knowledge that they associate with Neo-Nazis and Klu Klux Klan members. It was not so long ago that they were calling for &#8220;compulsory repatriation&#8221; of anyone not born here. Oh, and here&#8217;s the best bit &#8211; their constitution actually says that they will not accept members to their party unless they are &#8220;Indigenous Caucusians&#8221; &#8211; i.e. whites only. </p>
<p>Do your research next time &#8211; the problem is that its people like you who are fooled by the BNP and suggest the BNP is not racist or dangerous, that actually give it its credibility.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B Griffiths</title>
		<link>http://www.learnedfool.com/ban-on-religious-protests-should-be-extended#comment-42</link>
		<dc:creator>B Griffiths</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 19:08:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.learnedfool.com/?p=271#comment-42</guid>
		<description>Superb post! I agree with you 100%</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Superb post! I agree with you 100%</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

