<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Learned Fool &#187; Science &amp; Technology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.learnedfool.com/category/science-technology/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.learnedfool.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 02:26:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Designer baby clinics &#8211; is it worth it?</title>
		<link>http://www.learnedfool.com/designer-baby-clinics-is-it-worth-it</link>
		<comments>http://www.learnedfool.com/designer-baby-clinics-is-it-worth-it#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 13:20:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fool</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science & Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[designer baby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.learnedfool.com/?p=179</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A fertility clinic in the US will be offering parents the option of choosing their babyâ€™s features, such as eye and hair colour. Although they cannot guarantee results, they will allow certain parents the option of picking an embryo to be implanted. These embryo will first be screened for genetic abnormalities, but then they can [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><span lang="EN">
<p>A fertility clinic in the US will be offering parents the option of choosing their babyâ€™s features, such as eye and hair colour. Although they cannot guarantee results, they will allow certain parents the option of picking an embryo to be implanted. These embryo will first be screened for genetic abnormalities, but then they can make a decision based on physical characteristics, including sex.</p>
<p></span></div>
<p><span lang="EN">Interesting idea, but at the same time, a bit morbid. Before all this medical technology, a young coupleâ€™s answer to the inevitable first question, â€œDo you want a boy or girl?â€ would be â€œIt doesnâ€™t matter as long as itâ€™s healthyâ€ or (â€œYes,â€ if they want to be cheeky). Now, science can provide a healthy baby and your choice of boy or girl.</p>
<p>Have you ever thought what peopleâ€™s ideal would be when it comes to selection for physical characteristics and why? Do they see certain traits as inferior? What would it mean if everyone had the same ideal (fortunately, we all do not) of perfection? Would we be creating a whole new race that would be uniform?</p>
<p>Although some scientists will argue against the â€œdesigner babyâ€ idea on ethical reasons, my reservations are based on other issues. Obviously, there wonâ€™t be an ideal embryo because they wouldnâ€™t have had enough embryos to cover all possible combination of characteristics. But once you choose the embryo with your favourite combination, can you live with that decision? You wonâ€™t regret the others.? You wonâ€™t feel you have rejected these other potential children? Genetics may play a role in illness, but environment does too. Does the embryo have the required genes to effectively deal with the environmental consequences.? The child may have all the physical characters you wanted, but was it selected to be free of disease? Will this child have intelligence, ambition, spirit &#8211; all characteristics for which gene technology cannot identify? Will this childâ€™s disposition be one which you will enjoy? You surely canâ€™t determine that.</p>
<p>And what about the element of surprise? Though ultrasonic technology has allowed people to accurately predict the sex of their child, if they so wish, other characteristics are not determined before birth. There is that wonderful element of surprise when the child comes out. Will we start to feel complacent because we know what to expect?</p>
<p>The ethicists point out that these â€˜designer baby clinicsâ€™ will start â€œturning babies into commodities that you buy off the shelfâ€. Can you imagine if eBay suddenly started selling unused embryos? Who knows, desperate mothers out there may want that.<br />
</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.learnedfool.com/designer-baby-clinics-is-it-worth-it/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Simon Cowell joins list of cryonics believers</title>
		<link>http://www.learnedfool.com/simon-cowell-joins-list-of-cryonics-believers</link>
		<comments>http://www.learnedfool.com/simon-cowell-joins-list-of-cryonics-believers#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 18:19:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fool</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science & Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cryonics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Simon Cowell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ted Williams]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.learnedfool.com/?p=101</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is he serious? Is he truly serious? Simon Cowell wants to freeze his dead body so that science can revive it in a 100 years or so? Well, he must be. After all, he is an egomaniac. And, heâ€™s not the only one in the world to believe in cryonics. But letâ€™s look at the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
<p>Is he serious? Is he truly serious? Simon Cowell wants to freeze his dead body so that science can revive it in a 100 years or so? Well, he must be. After all, he is an egomaniac. And, heâ€™s not the only one in the world to believe in cryonics. But letâ€™s look at the situation realistically, shall we?</p>
<p>There have been scores of people already frozen in liquid nitrogen until such time when science can find a way to revitalise them. But what is the impact on the world? Letâ€™s say Simon dies at 80 and is frozen. A hundred or two hundred years from now, he is brought back to life. He thinks he can make an impact on a future society as an 80-year old? He will first have to learn to adapt to the world. He might not have much time for that unless science can also find a way to reverse the aging process. Heâ€™ll probably be preying on pretty women who are young enough to be his great-great-great-granddaughter (or, who maybe is).</p>
<p>Similarly, families have decided to all be frozen. Again, if they all die at different ages and were restored, how will that affect family relationships? Take the case of the famous American baseball player, Ted Williams. There was a big brouhaha after he was frozen. First of all, he was decapitated. So, before he can be resurrected, Dr. Frankenstein will need to do some work. Secondly, some DNA samples were taken from him and some have mysteriously disappeared. How will that affect his second coming? Apparently, he and two of his children signed a pact that they will all be frozen. What happens if they return older than him? I doubt baseball will be the same game in the next century.</p>
<p>What happens if the individualâ€™s estate runs out of funds to keep him frozen indefinitely? Will they just throw the body out? Or have a real funeral or cremation? These people are quite selfish in using their money to maintain their dead bodies for perpetuity. Quite conceited. As for the scientists who are wasting their time on this project rather than something much more worthwhile to the world, why didnâ€™t they just start with a lab rat? They take up much less room.</p>
<p>It seems like a monumental waste of money to be spending on a scientific process that will probably all be for naught. Atheists and pure evolutionists will argue it can be done, but since I believe in a component of creationism, I declare that no mortal man can bring a dead man back to life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.learnedfool.com/simon-cowell-joins-list-of-cryonics-believers/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

